Nested pipelines

A pipeline step can contain another pipeline: instead of computing a result directly, the step builds an inner pipeline and returns it. This allows to reuse a standard analysis pipeline inside a larger workflow.

Inner pipeline

We start with the same pipeline as in the previous “Split, map, and reduce” vignette, fitting a linear model and returning its coefficients. This will serve as our inner pipeline.

library(pipeflow)

inner <- pip_new("coefficients") |>
    pip_add("data", \(data = NULL) data) |>
    pip_add(
        "fit",
        \(data = ~data, xVar = "x", yVar = "y") {
            lm(paste(yVar, "~", xVar), data = data)
        }
    ) |>
    pip_add("coefs", \(fit = ~fit) coefficients(fit))

inner
# <pipeflow> coefficients (3 steps)
# ---------------------------------
#     step         params depends state
# 1:  data           data           new
# 2:   fit data,xVar,yVar    data   new
# 3: coefs            fit     fit   new
# ---------------------------------
# <ready> last run: never

Outer pipeline

The outer pipeline splits the data into subsets and derives the model coefficients by running the inner pipeline for each split.

# Helper to run inner pipeline
run_inner_pip <- function(pip, name, data) {
    pip$name <- sprintf("coefs for *%s*", name)

    # Set data subset for inner pipeline and run it
    pip_set_params(pip, list(data = data)) |> pip_run()

    pip[["coefs", "out"]]
}

outer <- pip_new("full analysis") |>
    pip_add("data", \(data = NULL) data) |>
    pip_add(
        "split_data", \(data = ~data, byVar = "by") {
            split(data, f = data[[byVar]])
        }
    ) |>
    pip_add(
        "inner_run",
        \(dataList = ~split_data, xVar = "x", yVar = "y") {
            p <- pip_clone(inner)

            # Forward parameters to inner
            pip_set_params(p, list(xVar = xVar, yVar = yVar))

            Map(
                f = run_inner_pip,
                name = names(dataList),
                data = dataList,
                MoreArgs = list(pip = p)
            )
        }
    ) |>
    pip_add(
        "combine",
        \(coefs = ~inner_run) as.data.frame(do.call(rbind, coefs))
    )

outer
# <pipeflow> full analysis (4 steps)
# ----------------------------------
#          step             params    depends state
# 1:       data               data              new
# 2: split_data         data,byVar       data   new
# 3:  inner_run dataList,xVar,yVar split_data   new
# 4:    combine              coefs  inner_run   new
# ----------------------------------
# <ready> last run: never

Note the inner_run step: its parameters xVar and yVar are forwarded to the inner pipeline.

Run nested pipeline

Let’s now set the analysis parameters and run the full pipeline:

outer |>
    pip_set_params(
        list(
            data = iris,
            xVar = "Sepal.Length",
            yVar = "Sepal.Width",
            byVar = "Species"
        )
    ) |>
    pip_run()
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.780 UTC]: Starting run of pipeflow 'full analysis'
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.780 UTC]: Step 1/4 data
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.781 UTC]: Step 2/4 split_data
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.782 UTC]: Step 3/4 inner_run
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.785 UTC]: Starting run of pipeflow 'coefs for *setosa*'
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.785 UTC]: Step 1/3 data
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.786 UTC]: Step 2/3 fit
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.787 UTC]: Step 3/3 coefs
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.788 UTC]: Finished run of pipeflow 'coefs for *setosa*'
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.792 UTC]: Starting run of pipeflow 'coefs for *versicolor*'
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.792 UTC]: Step 1/3 data
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.792 UTC]: Step 2/3 fit
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.793 UTC]: Step 3/3 coefs
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.794 UTC]: Finished run of pipeflow 'coefs for *versicolor*'
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.796 UTC]: Starting run of pipeflow 'coefs for *virginica*'
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.796 UTC]: Step 1/3 data
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.796 UTC]: Step 2/3 fit
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.797 UTC]: Step 3/3 coefs
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.798 UTC]: Finished run of pipeflow 'coefs for *virginica*'
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.799 UTC]: Step 4/4 combine
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.800 UTC]: Finished run of pipeflow 'full analysis'

The output of the inner_run step is a list of coefficient vectors, one for each species,

outer[["inner_run", "out"]]
# $setosa
#  (Intercept) Sepal.Length 
#   -0.5694327    0.7985283 
# 
# $versicolor
#  (Intercept) Sepal.Length 
#    0.8721460    0.3197193 
# 
# $virginica
#  (Intercept) Sepal.Length 
#    1.4463054    0.2318905

and the combine step returns the expected combined table.

outer[["combine", "out"]]
#            (Intercept) Sepal.Length
# setosa      -0.5694327    0.7985283
# versicolor   0.8721460    0.3197193
# virginica    1.4463054    0.2318905

Now suppose we want to change one of the model settings, say use Petal.Length instead of Sepal.Length as the predictor.

pip_set_params(outer, params = list(xVar = "Petal.Length"))

outer
# <pipeflow> full analysis (4 steps)
# ----------------------------------
#          step             params    depends    state                 out
# 1:       data               data                done <data.frame[150x5]>
# 2: split_data         data,byVar       data     done           <list[3]>
# 3:  inner_run dataList,xVar,yVar split_data outdated           <list[3]>
# 4:    combine              coefs  inner_run outdated   <data.frame[3x2]>
# ----------------------------------
# <ready> last run: 2026-09-27 20:21:16

Since the xVar parameter is part of the inner_run step’s function arguments, the inner_run step’s state (and its downstream dependencies) correctly has now been marked as “outdated”.

Forward inner pipeline parameters programmatically

While forwarding the parameters manually to the inner pipeline is straight-forward in our toy example, trying to manually synchronize real-world parameter sets between the outer and inner pipeline quickly becomes a unfeasible and a source for bugs that are hard to detect.

For this reason, in practice, the following pattern should be used, which basically just forwards the combined set of all existing parameters. To do this, we replace the inner_run step as follows:

outer |> pip_replace(
    "inner_run",
    \(dataList = ~split_data, ...) {
        p <- pip_clone(inner)

        # Forward all parameters (from outer and inner)
        all_params <- .self$get_params()
        pip_set_params(p, all_params)

        Map(
            f = run_inner_pip,
            name = names(dataList),
            data = dataList,
            MoreArgs = list(pip = p)
        )
    },
    params = pip_get_params(inner) # <--- default parameters of inner pipeline
)

outer
# <pipeflow> full analysis (4 steps)
# ----------------------------------
#          step                  params    depends    state                 out
# 1:       data                    data                done <data.frame[150x5]>
# 2: split_data              data,byVar       data     done           <list[3]>
# 3:  inner_run data,xVar,yVar,dataList split_data      new              [NULL]
# 4:    combine                   coefs  inner_run outdated   <data.frame[3x2]>
# ----------------------------------
# <ready> last run: 2026-09-27 20:21:16

In this version, the inner_run step no longer declares xVar and yVar as its own arguments. Instead, its parameters are seeded with the inner pipeline’s parameters via params = pip_get_params(inner), and the step forwards the combined parameter set at run time. Three aspects are worth spelling out:

Let’s re-run the full pipeline.

outer |>
    pip_set_params(
        list(
            data = iris,
            xVar = "Sepal.Length",
            yVar = "Sepal.Width",
            byVar = "Species"
        )
    ) |>
    pip_run()
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.869 UTC]: Starting run of pipeflow 'full analysis'
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.869 UTC]: Step 1/4 data
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.869 UTC]: Step 2/4 split_data
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.870 UTC]: Step 3/4 inner_run
# warn [2026-09-27 18:21:16.872 UTC]: Trying to set parameters not defined in the target: byVar
# Warning in pip_set_params(p, all_params): Trying to set parameters not defined in the target: byVar
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.874 UTC]: Starting run of pipeflow 'coefs for *setosa*'
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.874 UTC]: Step 1/3 data
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.875 UTC]: Step 2/3 fit
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.876 UTC]: Step 3/3 coefs
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.877 UTC]: Finished run of pipeflow 'coefs for *setosa*'
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.878 UTC]: Starting run of pipeflow 'coefs for *versicolor*'
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.878 UTC]: Step 1/3 data
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.879 UTC]: Step 2/3 fit
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.880 UTC]: Step 3/3 coefs
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.881 UTC]: Finished run of pipeflow 'coefs for *versicolor*'
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.882 UTC]: Starting run of pipeflow 'coefs for *virginica*'
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.882 UTC]: Step 1/3 data
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.883 UTC]: Step 2/3 fit
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.884 UTC]: Step 3/3 coefs
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.885 UTC]: Finished run of pipeflow 'coefs for *virginica*'
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.885 UTC]: Step 4/4 combine
# info [2026-09-27 18:21:16.886 UTC]: Finished run of pipeflow 'full analysis'

Note that the warning in the log above is expected and harmless. Basically, .self$get_params() returns the outer pipeline’s entire parameter set, which includes byVar (from the split_data step) while the inner pipeline only defines data, xVar, and yVar. Since pip_set_params() reports any parameters that are not defined in the target and simply leaves them unset, the inner pipeline still receives all parameters it knows and the result is unaffected.

If you need to omit the warning (e.g. in production code), just suppress it:

suppressWarnings(pip_set_params(p, all_params))

Alternatively, you could first restrict the forwarded parameters to those the inner pipeline actually knows. That has the same effect but adds code, and since forwarding the full parameter set is the whole point of this pattern, there is no need for it.

Again, changing one of the inner parameters will correctly outdate the inner_run step plus downstream dependencies.

pip_set_params(outer, params = list(xVar = "Petal.Length"))

outer
# <pipeflow> full analysis (4 steps)
# ----------------------------------
#          step                  params    depends    state                 out
# 1:       data                    data                done <data.frame[150x5]>
# 2: split_data              data,byVar       data     done           <list[3]>
# 3:  inner_run data,xVar,yVar,dataList split_data outdated           <list[3]>
# 4:    combine                   coefs  inner_run outdated   <data.frame[3x2]>
# ----------------------------------
# <ready> last run: 2026-09-27 20:21:16

With the above pattern, you can now change both the inner and outer pipeline, adding and/or removing any steps or parameters, without having to worry about parameter synchronization.

Built-in exec modes vs. nested pipelines

Both this and the previous vignette solve the same “split, apply, and combine” problem. The built-in execution modes (exec = "split"/"reduce") are the recommended default whenever they fit while nested pipelines can be considered the more general tool. As a rule of thumb: