# Bayesian Mediation Analysis in R

Perform mediation analysis in the presence of high-dimensional mediators based on the potential outcome framework. Bayesian Mediation Analysis (BAMA), developed by Song et al (2019) and Song et al (2020), relies on two Bayesian sparse linear mixed models to simultaneously analyze a relatively large number of mediators for a continuous exposure and outcome assuming a small number of mediators are truly active. This sparsity assumption also allows the extension of univariate mediator analysis by casting the identification of active mediators as a variable selection problem and applying Bayesian methods with continuous shrinkage priors on the effects.

## Installation

You can install `bama` from CRAN

    install.packages("bama")

or from Github via `devtools`

    # install.packages(devtools)
    devtools::install_github("umich-cphds/bama", built_opts = c())

`bama` requires the R packages `Rcpp` and `RcppArmadillo`, so you may want to install / update them before downloading. If you decide to install `bama` from source (eg github), you will need a C++ compiler that supports C++11. On Windows this can accomplished by installing Rtools, and Xcode on MacOS.

The Github version may contain new features or bug fixes not yet present on CRAN, so if you are experiencing issues, you may want to try the Github version of the package. ## Example problem `bama` contains a semi-synthetic example data set, `bama.data` that is used in this example. `bama.data` contains a continuous response `y` and a continuous exposure `a` that is mediated by 100 mediators, `m[1:100]`.

    library(bama)
    # print just the first 10 columns
    head(bama.data[,1:10])

The mediators have an internal correlation structure that is based off the covariance matrix from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) data. However, `bama` does not model internal correlation between mediators. Instead, `bama` employs continuous Bayesian shrinkage priors to select mediators and assumes that all the potential mediators contribute small effects in mediating the exposure-outcome relationship, but only a small proportion of mediators exhibit large effects.

We use no adjustment covariates in this example, so we just include the intercept. Also, in a real world situation, it may be beneficial to normalize the input data.

    Y <- bama.data$y
    A <- bama.data$a

    # grab the mediators from the example data.frame
    M <- as.matrix(bama.data[, paste0("m", 1:100)], nrow(bama.data))

    # We just include the intercept term in this example as we have no covariates
    C1 <- matrix(1, 1000, 1)
    C2 <- matrix(1, 1000, 1)
    beta.m  <- rep(0, 100)
    alpha.a <- rep(0, 100)

    out <- bama(Y = Y, A = A, M = M, C1 = C1, C2 = C2, method = "BSLMM", seed = 1234,
                burnin = 1000, ndraws = 1100, weights = NULL, inits = NULL,
                control = list(k = 2, lm0 = 1e-04, lm1 = 1, l = 1))

    # The package includes a function to summarise output from 'bama'
    summary <- summary(out)
    head(summary)

    # Product Threshold Gaussian
    ptgmod = bama(Y = Y, A = A, M = M, C1 = C1, C2 = C2, method = "PTG", seed = 1234,
                  burnin = 1000, ndraws = 1100, weights = NULL, inits = NULL,
                  control = list(lambda0 = 0.04, lambda1 = 0.2, lambda2 = 0.2))

    mean(ptgmod$beta.a)
    apply(ptgmod$beta.m, 2, mean)
    apply(ptgmod$alpha.a, 2, mean)
    apply(ptgmod$betam_member, 2, mean)
    apply(ptgmod$alphaa_member, 2, mean)

    # Gaussian Mixture Model
    gmmmod = bama(Y = Y, A = A, M = M, C1 = C1, C2 = C2, method = "GMM", seed = 1234,
                  burnin = 1000, ndraws = 1100, weights = NULL, inits = NULL,
                  control = list(phi0 = 0.01, phi1 = 0.01))

    mean(gmmmod$beta.a)
    apply(gmmmod$beta.m, 2, mean)
    apply(gmmmod$alpha.a, 2, mean)

    mean(gmmmod$sigma.sq.a)
    mean(gmmmod$sigma.sq.e)
    mean(gmmmod$sigma.sq.g)

## Reference

Song, Y, Zhou, X, Zhang, M, et al. Bayesian shrinkage estimation of high dimensional causal mediation effects in omics studies. Biometrics. 2019; 1-11.