Implementation of a transfer learning framework employing distribution mapping based domain transfer. Uses the renowned concept of histogram matching (see Gonzalez and Fittes (1977) <doi:10.1016/0094-114X(77)90062-3>, Gonzalez and Woods (2008) <isbn:9780131687288>) and extends it to include distribution measures like kernel density estimates (KDE; see Wand and Jones (1995) <isbn:978-0-412-55270-0>, Jones et al. (1996) <doi:10.2307/2291420). In the typical application scenario, one can use the underlying sample distributions (histogram or KDE) to generate a map between two distinct but related domains to transfer the target data to the source domain and utilize the available source data for better predictive modeling design. Suitable for the case where a one-to-one sample matching is not possible, thus one needs to transform the underlying data distribution to utilize the more available data for modeling.

For checking the dataset from EDC(Electronic Data Capture) in clinical trials.
             'dmtools' reshape your dataset in a tidy view and check events.
             You can reshape the dataset and choose your target to check, for example, the laboratory reference range.

Work within the 'dplyr' workflow to add random variates to your data frame. 
  Variates can be added at any level of an existing column.  Also, bounds can be specified 
  for simulated variates.

The function takes a DNA sequence, a start point, an end point in the sequence, dot size and dot color and draws a fractal image of the sequence. The fractal starts in the center of the canvas. The image is drawn by moving base by base along the sequence and dropping a midpoint between the actual point and the corner designated by the actual base. For more details see Jeffrey (1990) <doi:10.1093/nar/18.8.2163>, Hill, Schisler, and Singh (1992) <doi:10.1007/BF00178602>, and Löchel and Heider (2021) <doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2021.11.008>.

Performs Diffusion Non-Additive (DNA) model proposed by Heo, Boutelet, and Sung (2025+) <doi:10.48550/arXiv.2506.08328> for multi-fidelity computer experiments with tuning parameters. The DNA model captures nonlinear dependencies across fidelity levels using Gaussian process priors and is particularly effective when simulations at different fidelity levels are nonlinearly correlated. The DNA model targets not only interpolation across given fidelity levels but also extrapolation to smaller tuning parameters including the exact solution corresponding to a zero-valued tuning parameter, leveraging a nonseparable covariance kernel structure that models interactions between the tuning parameter and input variables. Closed-form expressions for the predictive mean and variance enable efficient inference and uncertainty quantification. Hyperparameters in the model are estimated via maximum likelihood estimation.